How does the majority of the user base level with this? If you don't use it for leveling what do you use it for?

I've not used this yet for leveling 1-100, but I am currently leveling a boosted RAF character (DK) from 90-100.  I am mostly using self made gathering profiles to level, at the moment, some in Pandaria (since the herbs and ore still sell for a lot on the AH), and some in Frostridge.  I wish I had more time from work to be able to really focus on making a 1-100 leveling profile, one for each faction, universal, just so everyone here would have access to one profile for everything leveling, but that would take some serious time that I just don't have to commit at this moment. 

I can't tell you how the grinding profiles here work, yet, but if I could give you advice, try some of the grinding profiles here or create your own and, when you run it, keep a close eye on the bot for the first hour or so, at least, just to make sure there's no hanging.  I will say the unstuck detection has really come a long way just in the last bot update itself, so this is very good news! 

There are also some leveling profiles on this site that span 10 levels each, I have quickly looked them over, and downloaded a couple of them, but I've not used them yet, maybe something for you to look into though as well! 

When i was playing on retail, i used a teleport cheat + bot for Archaeology.

Such a fast leveling method.

Since it doesn't exist anymore, i don't feel like i promote something: https://youtu.be/-qZFzeh3NWg?t=48s

 

But right now, i would recommend RAF and then just dungeon towing.

Yeah I've just been using it as a farming method. Mostly for farming certain pets. I havent been able to make a steady gold farming one that works though. It definitely would be nice to have a 1-100 profile leveling deal.The dungeon towing is a really good idea. I also could see it being its own feature in the future. Say where you have it que up and it follow's the leader of the party or something like that. I havent been able to level a character fully with this yet, because you have to keep changing the quester. I'll test out a couple of them and let you know though ;).