Jump to content

Zickefoose

Members
  • Posts

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Zickefoose got a reaction from JWalton85 in "Wanding"   
    To get wand working
    1. Add the Wand attack to your fighterclass
    2. Add Spell condition C Sharp Code
    !Lua.LuaDoString<bool>("return IsAutoRepeatAction(" + (SpellManager.GetSpellSlotId(SpellListManager.SpellIdByName("Shoot")) + 1) + ")")
    3. Profit.
     
    I also use set mine to only use wand when target is below a certain percent of health
  2. Confused
    Zickefoose reacted to Droidz in How to add buff condition when the buff has multiple IDs?   
    Hello,
    (wManager.Wow.ObjectManager.ObjectManager.Me.HaveBuff(1) || wManager.Wow.ObjectManager.ObjectManager.Me.HaveBuff(2)) or
    wManager.Wow.ObjectManager.ObjectManager.Me.HaveBuff(new List<uint> {1, 2})  
  3. Like
    Zickefoose got a reaction from Batman in "Wanding"   
    To get wand working
    1. Add the Wand attack to your fighterclass
    2. Add Spell condition C Sharp Code
    !Lua.LuaDoString<bool>("return IsAutoRepeatAction(" + (SpellManager.GetSpellSlotId(SpellListManager.SpellIdByName("Shoot")) + 1) + ")")
    3. Profit.
     
    I also use set mine to only use wand when target is below a certain percent of health
  4. Like
    Zickefoose got a reaction from anarchia in Hunter - ammo bags / loot and buying ammo   
    To bad no one is willing to help here. I think it has to do with greedy hands..... ( I.E. intentionally left out to encourage more fighter class sales )
  5. Like
    Zickefoose got a reaction from karap1234 in Complete List of FightClassEditor functionality ( Vanilla WoW )   
    So basically none? And again, it leads directly towards intentionally monetizing a second/third/fourth/fifth time over? I didnt realize I was buying a bot for developers. If I knew C# and all that then I cant imagine id have much use for wrobot anyway(?) Sure I could have done more research and realized I wasnt quite getting what I thought I was. Thats why im not all that down over it. Certainly got my moneys worth of time saved so far in WoW. Its just a shame that I was so excited thinking " holy crap this is to good to be true.,,, this editor is WAY to good to be true...". Sure enough, it was.
    I just think it should be advertised as such. And it sure as heck shouldnt have the price tag it has for the functionality it has.
    For clarification, lets say I did start back up on an Official server and got a wrobot key for official, everything would then work in the editor for that version? 100% functionality? Or will it be just the same, and require C# to do much anyway?
    I give it credit for what it does. And goodness I can only imagine what I could make it do if I actually knew how. But, I cant. So im stuck with the very basics, which is fine in itself to an extent. But, people should certainly be warned long in advance. The biggest issue I have is not knowing whether its straight BROKEN or if im just not doing something right. In most cases its "broken", and the amount of time I spent just to discover that basically everything in the editor is broken is the only issue I have. That time could have been spent actually playing the game ROFL.
    EDIT: for $20 a sale, the very least that can be done is remove ANY and ALL conditions that are BROKEN. This is not something that should be beyond the developers ability. Now, it might go against the possible business practice of fooling people. But, I see no reason those conditions cant just be removed, gray them out, make them disappear... something. ESPECIALLY, for someone running the TRAIL that is gonna have no freaking clue that all the conditions they see are really, not functioning at all. My understanding at this point, is that this is just the business model being used.
     
  6. Like
    Zickefoose got a reaction from tneticniro in Complete List of FightClassEditor functionality ( Vanilla WoW )   
    So basically none? And again, it leads directly towards intentionally monetizing a second/third/fourth/fifth time over? I didnt realize I was buying a bot for developers. If I knew C# and all that then I cant imagine id have much use for wrobot anyway(?) Sure I could have done more research and realized I wasnt quite getting what I thought I was. Thats why im not all that down over it. Certainly got my moneys worth of time saved so far in WoW. Its just a shame that I was so excited thinking " holy crap this is to good to be true.,,, this editor is WAY to good to be true...". Sure enough, it was.
    I just think it should be advertised as such. And it sure as heck shouldnt have the price tag it has for the functionality it has.
    For clarification, lets say I did start back up on an Official server and got a wrobot key for official, everything would then work in the editor for that version? 100% functionality? Or will it be just the same, and require C# to do much anyway?
    I give it credit for what it does. And goodness I can only imagine what I could make it do if I actually knew how. But, I cant. So im stuck with the very basics, which is fine in itself to an extent. But, people should certainly be warned long in advance. The biggest issue I have is not knowing whether its straight BROKEN or if im just not doing something right. In most cases its "broken", and the amount of time I spent just to discover that basically everything in the editor is broken is the only issue I have. That time could have been spent actually playing the game ROFL.
    EDIT: for $20 a sale, the very least that can be done is remove ANY and ALL conditions that are BROKEN. This is not something that should be beyond the developers ability. Now, it might go against the possible business practice of fooling people. But, I see no reason those conditions cant just be removed, gray them out, make them disappear... something. ESPECIALLY, for someone running the TRAIL that is gonna have no freaking clue that all the conditions they see are really, not functioning at all. My understanding at this point, is that this is just the business model being used.
     
×
×
  • Create New...